Redefine AI Delivery47 enterprise AI projects completed12 industries92% on-time delivery
AI Delivery and Governance

Enterprise AI implementation services from first pilot to governed scale

Most AI pilots stall before production. Your data is not ready, governance does not exist yet, and no one owns the handoff from experiment to system. Redefine runs the full delivery arc: readiness through roadmap through governed production, so your AI investments actually ship.

0
Projects completed
0
Days avg pilot-to-prod
0
Industries served
The delivery gap

Why AI pilot projects rarely make it to production

The problem is not the model. It is everything around the model: governance, data pipelines, stakeholder alignment, and a delivery process built for shipping, not experimenting.

The Redefine delivery model
  • One delivery arc: readiness through governed production

    Every engagement starts with a readiness and discovery sprint, so pilots are designed to ship from the first day of scoping.

  • Governance designed before Sprint 1

    Risk controls, compliance guardrails, and audit trails are part of your architecture: not bolted on after go-live.

  • Data readiness assessed and resolved upfront

    Your AI data readiness assessment happens before the build quote, so there are no surprises during implementation.

  • Roadmap to revenue, not to more workshops

    Your AI roadmap consulting engagement ends with a scoped delivery plan, milestone ownership, and a live return on investment model.

  • Production support built into the engagement

    Post-launch monitoring, model drift detection, and retraining schedules are scoped from day one: not sold later.

The old AI delivery model
  • Pilots run in isolation

    Each team builds its own AI experiment with no shared data, no governance framework, and no path to production.

  • Governance is an afterthought

    Risk controls and compliance guardrails get retrofitted after deployment, when they are most expensive to add.

  • Data readiness assumed, never confirmed

    Consultants scope the build before anyone checks whether your data pipelines, labels, or access policies are production-ready.

  • Roadmaps that lead to more workshops

    Six-figure strategy engagements that produce slide decks instead of shipping systems or traceable return on investment.

  • No handoff. No ownership post-launch.

    The consultants leave after go-live. Model drift, production incidents, and retraining cycles land back on your team.

AI delivery framework on whiteboard with healthy governance metrics — Discover, Assess, Pilot, Scale, Govern phases all green
Delivery framework

From scattered AI experiments to governed production in a structured arc

Select a delivery phase to see what each engagement produces, what your team provides, and what you receive at the end of each sprint.

01

AI Readiness

Baseline your org

02

AI Discovery

Map use cases

03

Governance

Risk and controls

04

Data Readiness

Pipeline and quality

05

Pilot Delivery

Build and ship

06

ROI and Scale

Measure and expand

Phase 01

AI Readiness Assessment

Before any build begins, your organisation's AI readiness is assessed across five dimensions: data maturity, infrastructure, skills, process, and governance baseline. You receive a scored readiness report and a prioritised gap list.

Duration: 2 weeks · Your time: 4 hours total

See the AI Readiness Assessment →
AI Readiness Report: Acme Corp · Q2 2025

Dimension scores

Data Maturity64 / 100
Infrastructure51 / 100
Skills and Capability38 / 100
Process Readiness72 / 100
Governance Baseline29 / 100

Priority gap: Governance baseline is critically low. Recommend governance framework sprint before any model deployment.

3 critical gaps5 moderate gaps4 strengths
Phase 02

AI Discovery Workshop

A structured workshop with your cross-functional team to surface, score, and prioritise AI use cases. Output is a ranked opportunity register with effort-impact scores, technical feasibility notes, and a 90-day pilot shortlist.

Duration: 3-day workshop + 1 week analysis · Your time: 12 hours across stakeholders

See the AI Discovery Workshop →
Use Case Register: Discovery Output
Use CaseImpactEffort

Document classification engine

Pilot shortlist

Support ticket routing AI

Pilot shortlist

Demand forecasting model

Wave 2

Contract extraction pipeline

Deferred
Phase 03

AI Governance and Risk Assessment

Before the first sprint, your AI governance and risk framework is designed. Risk register, model card template, bias testing protocols, and compliance mapping against relevant standards such as EU AI Act, SOC 2, and sector-specific rules.

Duration: 2 weeks · Your time: 6 hours with legal and compliance stakeholders

See Governance and Risk Assessment →
AI Risk Register: Document Classification Engine

Bias in classification outputs

Mitigation: fairness testing each sprint

Medium

Data access and PII exposure

Mitigation: RBAC + data masking layer

Mitigated

Model drift post-launch

Mitigation: monthly drift monitoring dashboard

Open

EU AI Act Article 9 compliance

Mapped: risk management system documented

Mapped
Phase 04

AI Data Readiness Assessment

Your data pipelines, labelling quality, access policies, and schema consistency are audited against the requirements of your target AI use case. You receive a data readiness score and a remediation roadmap your data team can act on immediately.

Duration: 1 to 2 weeks · Your time: 4 hours with data and engineering leads

See the AI Data Readiness Assessment →
Data Readiness Audit: document_pipeline_prod

Data completeness

94.2%

of records usable

Label quality score

67%

needs relabelling

Schema consistency

Pass

across 3 sources

Access policy

Gaps found

2 prod datasets open

Remediation: 3-week label quality sprint recommended before model training begins. Estimated effort: 80 annotation hours.

Phase 05

AI Pilot to Production Delivery

With readiness, discovery, governance, and data resolved, the build begins. Two-week sprints with a working demo at every review. Your AI delivery framework document ships at go-live alongside model cards, runbooks, and handoff documentation.

Duration: 8 to 14 weeks depending on scope · Your time: 3 to 4 hours per week for sprint reviews

Sprint Board: AI Pilot Delivery · Sprint 4 of 6

In Progress

Model training pipeline v2

ML-041

Drift monitoring hook

ML-042

Review

Inference API endpoint

ML-039

Model card docs

ML-040

Done

Feature store integration

ML-035

Training data pipeline

ML-036

Eval harness setup

ML-037
Phase 06

AI ROI Assessment and Scale Plan

Once the pilot is live, your AI ROI assessment captures actual versus projected value, surfaces the next highest-value use cases, and produces a scale plan for your Wave 2 roadmap. This is the handoff document your board needs to approve the next phase of investment.

Duration: 3 weeks post-launch · Your time: 4 hours with business and technical leads

See the AI ROI Assessment →
AI ROI Assessment · 90-day post-launch

Hours saved per week

140 hours

versus 12 projected

Accuracy at 90 days

93.4%

versus 88% target

Annualised ROI

4.2x

cost of engagement

Wave 2 recommendation

Apply same architecture to contract extraction use case. Estimated additional 60 hours/week saved. Data readiness already confirmed in Phase 04.

Five structured engagements

Every delivery service in your AI governance and implementation programme

Run them in sequence as a full delivery arc, or deploy any individual engagement to close a specific gap. Each produces a concrete, actionable output: not a summary deck.

2 weeks · highest leverage

AI Governance and Risk Assessment

Your governance framework, model risk register, bias testing protocols, and compliance mapping: designed before the first sprint so they are embedded into your architecture, not retrofitted after deployment.

Risk registerModel card templatesEU AI Act mappingBias test protocols
See governance assessment →
Governance Framework
Risk controls: Active
Compliance layer: EU AI Act mapped
Audit trail: Configuring
Human-in-loop controls: Defined
Real delivery, real results

What structured implementation delivers for enterprise operations

AI risk register and governance scorecard with Azure AI Foundry and Microsoft Purview AI governance, all assessments passed

Half Price Drapes

Ecommerce and ERP

Large-scale ecommerce retailer. Multi-channel operations across inventory, orders, and customer data: all fragmented across systems with no unified delivery programme.

The problem

Disconnected data across multiple systems created operational bottlenecks, decision-making was slow, and the ecommerce platform could not support scale across channels. Each system was maintained independently with no shared governance or real-time visibility.

Delivery approach

A structured platform migration and data integration programme unified inventory, order, and customer data into real-time dashboards and automated reporting via a centralised ERP and analytics layer. Ecommerce platform upgraded with a conversion-focused, mobile-optimised architecture.

Klaviyo lifecycle automation, GA4, Google Shopping feeds, and paid acquisition infrastructure were all integrated in a single governed delivery arc, with clear handoff documentation at every milestone.

ERP integrationReal-time dashboardsMulti-channel dataPlatform migration

Result

0

Million in annual revenue

  • Operational efficiency improved through real-time inventory and order visibility across all sales channels

  • Integrated analytics reduced manual reporting overhead and accelerated decision-making cycles

  • Scalable, governed architecture positioned the organisation for continued growth without future replatforming

Enterprise implementation and platform migration. Service: Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Headless Ecommerce.

Governance architecture

Five governance layers built into every AI delivery engagement

Select a layer to see what it covers, what it produces, and where it sits in your architecture.

Risk Controls

Layer 1

Model Registry

Layer 2

Compliance Engine

Layer 3

Audit Trail

Layer 4

Human Oversight

Layer 5

Layer 01: Risk Controls

Every use case receives a risk classification before the build begins. Risk categories: operational impact, bias potential, data exposure, adversarial vulnerability, and regulatory applicability. Controls are designed per risk level: not applied universally.

Outputs: risk register, control matrix, mitigation sprint plan, quarterly review cadence definition.

Risk Control Matrix · v1.4
Bias potentialMedium: bias testing each sprint
Data exposureLow: RBAC in place
Regulatory applicabilityHigh: EU AI Act scope confirmed
Operational impactMedium: fallback mode defined

Layer 02: Model Registry

Every model deployed through a Redefine engagement is registered with a structured model card: training data provenance, performance benchmarks across demographic slices, known failure modes, and retraining schedule. The registry is versioned and auditable.

Outputs: model card per use case, version history, performance baseline report, retraining trigger definitions.

Model Registry · doc-classifier-v3
Model IDdoc-classifier-v3.1.2
Training datainternal-contracts-2023 to 2024
Accuracy (overall)93.4%
Retrain triggerbelow 89% on weekly eval
Last retrain2025-04-11

Layer 03: Compliance Engine

Regulatory applicability is mapped at the discovery phase. For most enterprise deployments this covers: EU AI Act risk classification, SOC 2 data handling controls, GDPR Article 22 automated decision rights, and sector-specific requirements such as HIPAA or FCA guidelines where applicable.

Outputs: compliance matrix, Article 9 risk management documentation, transparency disclosure templates.

Compliance Matrix
EU AI Act Article 9: risk management system
GDPR Art. 22: automated decisions disclosed
SOC 2 Type II: data access controls documented
FCA AI governance: in review

Layer 04: Audit Trail

Every prediction, classification, and automated action is logged with a structured audit record: input hash, model version, confidence score, output, and timestamp. Immutable log storage is configured at deployment. You can answer any audit question about your AI system without writing new code.

Outputs: audit log schema, retention policy, query interface spec, incident response runbook.

Audit Log · last 4 events
2025-05-14 09:14:02 classify OK confidence=0.96 model=v3.1.2
2025-05-14 09:14:08 classify OK confidence=0.91 model=v3.1.2
2025-05-14 09:15:33 classify LOW_CONF=0.61 routed to human
2025-05-14 09:16:11 human_review OVERRIDDEN label=invoice

Layer 05: Human Oversight

Human-in-the-loop controls are designed for every use case where a low-confidence output, a high-stakes decision, or a contested prediction requires a human reviewer. Escalation thresholds, review queues, and override logging are implemented before the pilot goes live.

Outputs: HITL workflow design, confidence threshold settings, reviewer interface brief, escalation playbook.

Human Review Queue
Document IDConfidenceEscalation reason
INV-204410.61Below threshold
CTR-008290.53High-stakes category
PO-112030.64Conflicting signals
98.2% of requests auto-resolved · 1.8% to human queue
Why Redefine for AI delivery

Governed delivery is not a premium add-on: it is the standard

Other implementation partners deliver results. Redefine delivers governed, documented, production-ready systems that your organisation can own, maintain, and scale without us in the room.

No commitment. No pitch. A 45-minute conversation about where your AI programme is today and what a structured delivery arc would look like.

AI governance consulting built into delivery: not retrofitted

Typical partners add governance after deployment when it is expensive and disruptive. Every Redefine engagement includes a governance sprint before the first line of model code is written.

Scoped before you sign: not estimated after

Readiness and data assessments happen before the build proposal. Your scope is based on what we found, not what we assumed. No surprise change requests mid-delivery.

AI roadmap consulting that ends in a delivery plan

Strategy workshops that produce slide decks without a delivery plan are expensive positioning exercises. Your AI roadmap engagement ends with milestone ownership, resource commitments, and a live return on investment model.

Production support included: not sold separately

Drift monitoring, model retraining schedules, and production incident playbooks are scoped as part of the delivery engagement. Your team inherits a running system with documentation: not an orphaned model.

Questions before you book

What enterprise teams ask before starting a delivery engagement

Answered directly. No pitch language.

Our AI delivery framework is a five-phase structured programme: readiness assessment, discovery workshop, governance design, data readiness, pilot delivery, and post-launch return on investment measurement. You receive documented deliverables at every stage: not internal working documents. The framework follows EU AI Act risk classification, SOC 2 data controls, and GDPR Article 22 disclosure requirements as a baseline, with sector-specific additions where applicable.

For a single use case, the full arc from first assessment to governed production typically runs 14 to 22 weeks depending on data readiness and scope. The first two phases: readiness and discovery: take four to five weeks. Governance and data readiness add three to four weeks. The pilot build runs eight to twelve weeks. We publish this timeline in your scoped proposal before work begins, with milestone dates your team can hold us to.

We design around your existing infrastructure. Our data readiness assessment identifies what your current stack supports and where it needs to be extended. We have delivered on Azure, AWS, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, and on-premise environments. If your stack genuinely cannot support the target use case, we tell you in the readiness assessment: before the build is scoped or budgeted.

Most enterprises have data gaps. That is expected and planned for. Your AI data readiness assessment produces a remediation roadmap your data team can execute in parallel with governance design: so the build is not blocked waiting for clean data. In most cases, remediation runs alongside the governance sprint, adding two to three weeks rather than stalling the whole programme.

Yes. Any individual engagement can be run as a standalone. If you already have a discovery output and need only the governance framework, we scope that alone. If you have a live system and need a post-launch return on investment assessment and scale plan, that runs as a standalone three-week engagement. The five phases form a complete arc, but each produces a standalone deliverable you can use independently.

Large consultancies produce reports and recommendations. Redefine produces deployable systems with governance built in. The AI readiness assessment costs less than a typical strategy engagement and ends with an actionable gap register, not a market landscape deck. The discovery workshop produces a use case shortlist with effort-impact scores and data requirements: not a slide deck with 47 potential AI opportunities and no next step.

Start your delivery arc

Get a scoped AI delivery proposal in 3 business days

Tell us where your AI programme is today. We'll review your situation and propose which enterprise AI implementation services apply to your current gap: and which ones do not. No commitment. No pitch.

Engineering lead and business analyst reviewing go-live metrics together on Microsoft Purview AI governance dashboard, morning light
Response within 48 hours
Proposal in 3 business days
47 enterprise projects completed
You own all deliverables

Tell us about your AI programme

Get on a call with us to see how we can help you

Get a Quote