39 Vue.js applications delivered
·
Vue 3 · Composition API · Nuxt 3 · Pinia
Vue.js Development Services

Vue.js apps your team
Fast and Stable
and actually owns

Architecture is set in sprint one, not sprint fourteen. Composition API only. Pinia state by design. Vite performance budgets enforced in CI before any code ships. Your team stops firefighting Vue and starts shipping features.

Vue 3
Composition API
Pinia
Nuxt 3
Vite
Vue Router 4
VueUse
TypeScript
Vue.js developer team pair-reviewing single-file components on monitors in a natural-light workspace
The real cost

Vue is approachable. A messy Vue codebase is a different story.

Teams treat Vue's flexibility as a design decision. It is not. Without an enforced architecture from sprint one, the same patterns appear on every project: a bloated bundle, two API styles in the same file, and a migration no one wants to own. Here is what it costs.

Bundle bloat
0
MB initial load at 12 months
"We launched at 320kb. After 8 feature sprints we hit 2.1MB and mobile bounce spiked."

No bundle budget set in CI. No lazy route splitting. Mobile users see a slow spinner. Bounce rates climb. Revenue walks.

Onboarding drag
0
weeks to onboard one developer
"Half the components use Options API, half use Composition API. Every file reads differently."

Options API in one file. Composition API in the next. No enforced pattern means every developer reads a different codebase. At $150/hour, that is $24,000 per hire.

Upgrade paralysis
0
months for an unplanned Vue 2 migration
"The Vuex to Pinia migration alone blocked two sprints. No one had mapped the dependency chain."

Vuex dependencies unmapped. 40+ components with breaking changes. No migration plan in the original scope. The upgrade blocks new features for half a year.

Pain · Developer staring at slow-loading Vue application on monitor

Vue.js developer reviewing a fast, working Vue application with a green Vite dev server and passing performance budget

The pattern we prevent

Performance and architecture are afterthoughts in sprint 14. They should be constraints in sprint 1.

Replace with developer staring at slow-loading application indicator, desk lamp light, tense focus, no eye contact · 1200×400

Calculate your return

See the numbers before any commitment.

Set your team size, budget, and timeline. The calculator shows what a proper architecture sprint saves across your full engagement.

Your project details

Frontend team size5 devs
Sprint velocity (features per two-week sprint)30 pts
Monthly frontend budget$30,000
Project duration6 months

Estimates use conservative benchmarks from our Vue.js projects. Your result depends on codebase size, team experience, and integration scope.

What architecture-first Vue.js development returns

+10
More features per sprint
$8,400
Estimated monthly savings
6 weeks
Faster delivery
168%
12-month ROI

Total projected savings over your engagement: $50,400.

How we build

Four Vue.js decisions made in sprint one that protect your codebase for years.

01 · Single File Components

One file. One component. Every time.

Your team stops debating where logic lives. Template, script, and style live in one .vue file. Composition API only, no Options API. Whether one developer or twelve wrote it, the codebase reads the same.

  • Composition API only — no mixed patterns that slow future hires
  • TypeScript end to end — fewer runtime bugs, faster refactoring
  • Storybook documented — every component usable without reading source code
01
UserCard.vueVue 3
<template>
<div class="user-card">
<h3>{{ user.name }}</h3>
<p>{{ user.role }}</p>
</div>
</template>
<script setup lang="ts">
import { computed } from 'vue'
interface User { name: string; role: string }
const props = defineProps<{ user: User }>()
const initials = computed(() =>
props.user.name.split(' ').map(n => n[0]).join('')
)
</script>
<style scoped>
.user-card { border-radius: 12px; }
</style>
02
stores/cart.tsPinia
import { defineStore } from 'pinia'
export const useCartStore = defineStore('cart', () => {
// State
const items = ref<CartItem[]>([])
const isLoading = ref(false)
// Getters
const total = computed(() =>
items.value.reduce((s, i) => s + i.price, 0)
)
// Actions
async function addItem(item: CartItem) {
isLoading.value = true
await api.cart.add(item)
items.value.push(item)
isLoading.value = false
}
return { items, isLoading, total, addItem }
})
02 · Pinia State Architecture

State every developer on your team can trust.

Stores scoped to features, typed end to end, and visible in Vue DevTools. No global blob that everyone fears touching. Every state change is traceable. Every action is testable. Your team can read and change state without Slack-ing the original author.

  • Feature-scoped stores — changes stay contained
  • DevTools connected — debug state in seconds, not hours
  • Full TypeScript typing — catch state errors before they reach production
03 · Vite Build Performance

Sub-second dev reload. Production bundles inside the budget.

Vite runs from day one with tree shaking and lazy route splitting. Performance budgets are set in CI. Every pull request shows the bundle delta. Core Web Vitals targets are agreed before sprint one. No surprises at launch.

  • Bundle budgets in CI — a PR that exceeds the limit does not merge
  • Lazy route splitting — users only load what they visit
  • Core Web Vitals tracked per sprint — performance is reported, not assumed
03
vite build output
vite v5.4.2 building for production...
transforming...
294 modules transformed.
dist/index 0.48 kB
dist/assets/index-BdWQ4.css 24.6 kB
dist/assets/vendor-CvKnBE.js 62.4 kB gzip: 22.1 kB
dist/assets/dashboard-DxK.js 31.2 kB gzip: 11.8 kB
dist/assets/analytics-bGn.js 18.7 kB gzip: 7.4 kB
built in 4.82s
Running performance budget check...
All routes under 80kb limit
LCP budget: 1.4s PASS
CLS score: 0.04 PASS
$
04
Nuxt 3 rendering strategy
RouteModeTTFBLCP
/SSG12ms0.8s
/products/[slug]SSR38ms1.1s
/dashboardCSR6ms1.8s
/blog/[slug]SSG9ms0.9s
Nuxt 3 incremental static regeneration + partial hydration active
04 · Nuxt 3 + SSR / SSG

The right rendering mode per route. Not per project.

Content pages get static generation. Dynamic data gets server-side rendering. Authenticated dashboards get client-side rendering. Google sees content, not a spinner. Every route gets the right strategy before code is written.

  • SSG / SSR / CSR per route — matched to what each page needs
  • Incremental static regeneration — fresh content without a full rebuild
  • Partial hydration — less JavaScript shipped to users who don't need it
Client result

How a complete frontend rebuild delivers real inventory visibility.

B2B Heavy Equipment Platform

Equipment operations team reviewing live inventory and order management on rebuilt headless enterprise platform
Real client result

Replace with equipment operations team reviewing live dashboard, warehouse/office context, side lighting · 1200×400

Client

Lano Equipment, Inc.

B2B Heavy Equipment Platform

The Problem

Legacy WordPress could not handle catalog complexity or ERP integration. Inventory was incomplete online. Data was siloed. Every update required manual coordination between the website and the ERP system. Buyers could not trust what they saw.

Engagement Timeline
Week 1-2

Architecture sprint

API design, component hierarchy, ERP connector spec

Week 3-7

Core frontend

Catalog, search, product detail pages, mobile-first

Week 8-12

ERP integration live

Real-time inventory sync, parts data automated

Week 13-16

Launch

Klaviyo, QA, production deployment

The Result
0

systems unified — ERP, frontend, marketing, inventory, and analytics now share one headless architecture.

  • Buyers see live inventory for the first time

  • ERP sync replaced manual data entry across two systems

  • Codebase is owned by the client's team, no vendor lock-in

39 Vue.js applications delivered
·
Case study data verified from client project records
Why it matters

Three practices that protect your Vue.js codebase. Most agencies skip all three.

Claim 01
Architecture before components.
Every Vue.js project starts with a two-week architecture sprint. We deliver a component hierarchy diagram, store design document, routing structure, and composables specification. You see the full blueprint before sprint two. One early decision separates a codebase that scales from one that needs a rewrite at month 14.
Claim 02
No Options API in your codebase.
Every component uses Vue 3 Composition API with <script setup> and TypeScript. No mixed patterns. No exceptions for legacy reasons. No Options API "just this once." When any developer opens any file, they read the same architecture. Consistency is what separates a codebase your team owns from one your team avoids.
Claim 03
Performance is a contract, not a goal.
There is no "optimize in sprint 20" on a Redefine project. Constraints are set in sprint one. Core Web Vitals targets are in the proposal and treated as acceptance criteria. Bundle budgets are in Vite and gated in CI. A pull request that breaches the limit does not merge. Lighthouse scores appear in every sprint review.

What your Vue.js codebase gets

01

Architecture Decision Record

Component tree, store map, routing structure, composable inventory. Delivered before sprint 2.

02

Storybook component library

Every component documented with props, slots, and usage examples. Your team ships new features without reading source code.

03

Vitest unit test coverage above 85%

Component tests, store actions, composables. CI blocks any merge that drops below threshold. Your codebase does not regress silently.

04

Handoff documentation your team owns

Architecture guide, contribution conventions, upgrade path. Your team operates and extends the codebase independently. No ongoing dependency on Redefine.

Frequently asked

The questions CTOs ask before hiring a Vue.js company.

Architecture, timelines, and migration risk matter more than framework selection. These are the answers that actually change how you evaluate a partner.

Pricing approach

Scoped before work starts. Line by line. No commitment required to see a proposal.

A Vue.js discovery sprint produces a fixed-price architecture document and sprint plan. You see every deliverable and its cost before signing anything.

We build progressive web applications, enterprise admin dashboards, B2B portals, headless ecommerce frontends, and SaaS product interfaces. Vue.js works best when the team needs a structured frontend without the overhead of a larger framework. View related services on our Technology Stack page.

We work with existing Vue 2 applications and deliver a Vue 3 migration path as part of every engagement. We audit the Vuex store structure, identify Composition API refactor candidates, map the Vue Router upgrade requirements, and execute the migration incrementally so you stay in production throughout. Request a Vue code audit to see the full scope before committing.

Search engine optimization requirements, authentication surface area, and route rendering needs determine the choice. If more than 30% of routes need to be indexable and the data model supports server rendering, Nuxt is the default. For fully authenticated software-as-a-service products with no public content, plain Vue with Vite is often leaner and faster to ship. The architecture sprint produces this decision in writing before sprint two.

Architecture sprint: 2 weeks. Greenfield Vue 3 SPA: 10 to 16 weeks. Nuxt 3 SSR application with API integration: 14 to 20 weeks. Vue 2 migration with Pinia rewrite: 8 to 14 weeks. Every project begins with a sprint plan showing week-by-week deliverables before code starts.

Everything. The full codebase is committed to your repository throughout the engagement. Storybook is deployed to your hosting. Architecture Decision Records and contribution guides live in your project wiki. Your team can maintain, extend, and upgrade the codebase with no dependency on Redefine. Full ownership is a delivery requirement, not an optional extra.

Is this the right match?

Is Vue.js the right choice for your project?

Select the cards that describe your situation. We are direct about fit. If Vue.js is not the right tool, we will tell you that too.

Fit score0 of 6 selected

Still unsure? Send your situation and we will tell you directly whether Vue.js fits before you scope anything.

Building a new SPA or PWA with complex UI state

Multi-step flows, real-time data, reactive components across multiple feature modules.

Existing Vue 2 codebase that needs senior architecture support

Performance issues, Vuex complexity, or a Composition API migration backlog.

Headless ecommerce frontend that needs performance and SEO

Nuxt 3 with SSR and SSG, API-first architecture, sub-1.5s LCP on product pages.

Scaling a Vue.js project to a team of 6 or more

Requires enforced patterns, a shared component library, and onboarding documentation.

Not the right match if:

Your total project budget is under $10,000

The architecture sprint takes two weeks. We cannot skip it. Skipping it is how bad Vue codebases happen.

You need a simple static marketing site

Vue.js is the wrong tool for this. We will tell you what is better and suggest a more cost-efficient path.

Start here

Describe your situation. Get a scoped Vue.js proposal.

No commitment. No pitch. A scoped proposal arrives in 3 business days. Sprint 1 starts within a week of sign-off.

01

Submit your brief

Takes 3 minutes. Describe your situation, not a solution.

02

Technical call within 48 hours

With a Vue.js architect. Not a sales person.

03

Scoped proposal in 3 days

Architecture plan, sprint schedule, line-item pricing.

04

Sprint 1 within 1 week of sign-off

Architecture sprint delivers the blueprint before the first component is written.

Form

Call within 48 hours · Proposal in 3 days · Sprint 1 within a week of sign-off

48 hours
Technical call
3 days
Scoped proposal
39
Vue.js projects
Full ownership
All code and docs

Get on a call with us to see how we can help you

Get a Quote